25% Threat to Offshore Contractor Invoices

Introduction

A U.S. proposal would slap a 25% tax on payments to foreign workers for services consumed in the U.S., putting offshore contractor invoices squarely in the crosshairs.

Unlike tariffs on goods, this plan targets services, applying a uniform 25% excise tax to cross‑border payments that benefit U.S. customers.

If enacted, the measure could reshape the economics of global outsourcing, altering client-vendor pricing, margins, and location strategy. Analysts warn it would pressure India’s export-heavy outsourcing model while forcing U.S. buyers to rethink how and where services are delivered.

For finance leaders, the playbook shifts fast: quantify invoice-level exposure, map services consumed in the U.S., run scenario models, and prepare contract levers that address tax allocation, gross-ups, and change-in-law risk. The sooner you model the cost curve and compliance workflow, the more room you have to negotiate and adapt.

This article explains what the bill covers, how to model invoice impact, which contract and compliance updates to prioritize, and the decision timeline finance teams should use now.

What the Halting International Relocation of Employment Act Covers

At its core, the HIRE Act would impose a uniform 25% excise tax on payments U.S. companies make to foreign persons for services that benefit users in the United States. Put simply, it targets “outsourcing payments,” adding a 25 per cent tax when a U.S. person buys offshore services consumed domestically.

The policy intent is explicit: discourage shifting service work abroad and redirect revenue to U.S. workers. As bill sponsor Sen. Bernie Moreno framed it, the proposal is designed to “hit them…pocketbooks” if companies prefer foreign labor over American workers. Practically, coverage hinges on who gets paid (a foreign person) and where the benefit lands (inside the U.S.), regardless of where the tasks are performed, according to tax advisors analyzing the bill’s scope for U.S. payers to foreign persons.

In scope are common cross‑border service arrangements in IT, engineering, finance operations, and customer support when those services serve U.S. users. Where engagements blend onshore and offshore delivery, practitioners expect apportionment for mixed services so only the U.S.-benefiting portion is taxed, requiring clearer scoping and billing detail on invoices.

A notable design feature is the creation of a Domestic Workforce Fund that would channel revenue from the excise to support American workers, reinforcing the bill’s political and economic rationale.

If enacted as drafted, the HIRE Act would broaden the tax cost of offshore services that benefit U.S. customers and force more precise service scoping, billing, and sourcing documentation.

Key Takeaways:

• The bill adds a flat 25% excise tax to outsourcing payments when services benefit U.S. users.
• Coverage focuses on U.S. payers, foreign recipients, and where the benefit is consumed, not where work happens.
• Mixed-delivery engagements may require apportionment and more granular invoicing to determine taxable amounts.

Modeling Invoice Impact for Offshore Contractor Payments

A single invoice can swing your margin. Under the proposal, the same $100,000 payment to an offshore contractor could trigger a $25,000 excise before you even consider tax deductibility.

At a high level, the HIRE Act would impose a 25% excise tax on outsourcing payments while also denying the deduction for those payments and raising related penalties. Because the levy applies directly to the gross invoice amount, finance teams must treat it as a top-line surcharge rather than a net-after-deduction adjustment.

To model the impact accurately, tag invoice lines that benefit U.S. users, then calculate the excise on that taxable base. Next, layer in the loss of deductibility: multiply the disallowed amount by your organization’s tax rate to capture the incremental income tax cost, and add that to the excise to find the all-in effective price of the service. Finally, compare this all-in cost to alternatives (onshore, nearshore, automation) to determine whether to reprice, rescope, or relocate the work.

Two practical enhancements improve precision and defensibility. First, require vendors to break out delivery location and beneficiary location on each invoice to support apportionment where services are mixed. Second, add cost-driver tags in your GL or AP system so finance can quickly pivot scenarios across vendors, workstreams, and quarters without rebuilding models each time assumptions change.

Do not ignore enforcement exposure. Advisors note the bill would increase the penalty for failures to pay taxes tied to outsourcing payments, so scenario plans should include cash-flow timing for remittance and controls to validate which lines are in scope.

Build this as a repeatable calculator now so you can price, negotiate, and budget with confidence if the proposal advances.

Key Takeaways:

• Treat the excise as a surcharge on the gross invoice and add the separate cost of lost deductibility based on your company tax rate.
• Require vendors to specify where services are delivered and where benefits accrue to support apportionment and audit readiness.
• Operationalize a modeling template in AP/GL with tags so finance can re-run scenarios quickly across vendors and quarters.

Contract Terms, Tax Withholding, and Compliance Readiness

If enacted, the HIRE Act would impose a 25 per cent tax on U.S. companies that pay foreign workers for services consumed in the United States—turning tax allocation and invoice wording into urgent contract issues.

Start with commercial protections. Law firms are advising buyers and vendors to assess exposure and build flexibility into their contracts so pricing, scope, and payment mechanics can adjust if an excise applies. In parallel, remember your existing cross‑border obligations: under IRS rules, a withholding agent is responsible for withholding on certain payments to foreign persons and can be personally liable if tax isn’t withheld or reported correctly.

Translate that into paper and process. Contracts should specify who bears the excise (buyer-pay, vendor gross‑up, or tax‑inclusive pricing), define how the “U.S. benefit” share will be determined, and require data fields on invoices that support apportionment and audit. Operationally, ensure your tax ops can calculate, remit, and book any excise separately from income tax, while continuing to meet existing reporting on Forms 1042 and 1042‑S for payments already subject to withholding.

Add enforcement and continuity language where it matters. Include change‑in‑law triggers, pre‑agreed rate cards for pass‑throughs, and termination or rescoping rights if the tax materially alters unit economics. Require counterparties to cooperate on beneficiary‑location attestations and to notify you of subcontracting or delivery‑location changes that could shift tax exposure.

Summed up: clear tax allocation, robust documentation, and ready‑to‑run compliance workflows will reduce surprises if the 25% excise becomes law.

Key Takeaways:

• Bake in tax allocation, apportionment rules, and change‑in‑law flexibility so invoices and pricing can adjust to a potential 25% excise.
• Use your existing withholding playbook: designate a responsible party, preserve documentation, and keep reporting on IRS cross‑border forms current.
• Stand up processes to calculate, remit, and disclose any excise separately, with vendors obligated to provide location and beneficiary data to support compliance.

Legislative Outlook and Decision Timeline for Finance Teams

The HIRE Act would create a 25% excise tax and make outsourcing payments non-deductible, a one-two cost hit that warrants proactive planning now rather than later.

Practitioner analysis notes the provision would raise revenue, which increases its political appeal as a pay-for in broader negotiations. International coverage also underscores that the proposal targets services consumed in the United States, shifting policy attention from goods to services and amplifying pressure from stakeholders seeking clarity on scope and timing.

Set a practical decision cadence. Now: surface exposure by mapping which vendor invoices benefit U.S. users and draft optionality into contracts so pricing can flex if the tax triggers. As the bill advances: build budget scenarios that treat the excise as a gross-up and layer in the loss of deductibility, while sequencing vendor negotiations to preserve rescoping rights. If enacted: activate tax calculation and remittance workflows, roll out invoice-apportionment rules, and communicate price adjustments to customers or internal stakeholders with clear audit support.

Expect technical questions to persist until implementing guidance arrives, especially for mixed-delivery services and intercompany flows. Use that uncertainty time to validate invoice data requirements and to pre-approve playbooks for repricing, rebidding, or relocating work if the economics flip.

Bottom line: a clear internal timeline—exposure mapping now, contracting flexibility as the bill moves, and execution-ready tax ops if it passes—reduces surprises and protects margins.

Key Takeaways:

• The proposal combines a new excise with non-deductibility, so finance should model both effects on every offshore invoice.
• Political likelihood rises when measures raise revenue; prepare contingency budgets and vendor options before negotiations heat up.
• Because the tax targets services consumed in the U.S., build invoice-level apportionment and contract flexibility to adapt quickly if the bill advances.

Make Offshore Invoices HIRE Act–Ready with Bitwage

The proposed 25% excise puts a premium on precision: where services are consumed, how invoices are scoped, and how fast you can adapt your payment rails. Bitwage helps finance teams stay ahead with global payroll that pays same-day in cryptocurrency, stablecoins, or local currency; W-2–compliant payroll; and crypto-powered benefits. Beyond payouts, Bitwage streamlines invoice management, expense tracking, and automated accounting—backed by a spotless, 10-year, zero-breach security record and trusted by 4,500+ companies paying 90,000+ workers across nearly 200 countries with over $400 million processed.

Turn uncertainty into optionality. Modernize your cross-border payouts, cut friction and FX costs, and keep contractors paid in their preferred currencies—while maintaining the documentation discipline your auditors expect. Get ahead of the policy timeline before your next invoice cycle: Signup for Crypto Payroll today! Prefer a walkthrough? Schedule a crypto payroll demo and see stablecoin and local-currency payouts in action.